Lying As Usual

It's already started. The "corrections" of the story about what really happened at the place where Osama bin Laden was killed; murdered, to be precise. The biggie here is that he was unarmed; so, they shot  a defenseless man in the head. Now, they say that, nevertheless, he "resisted." How? With what? It's been my experience that, when people don't give a complete account of their actions from the start, and change it over time, they are lying. And the only reason that you lie is because you have done something wrong. If you have done nothing wrong, there's no reason to change your story. First, they said that the President and some of his staff were privy to what was going on "in real time", giving the impression that they could see and hear what was going on in the military operation. Now, the new CIA chief says that there was a "20 to 25-minute period" during which they were blacked out. There are just too many inconsistencies and changes of story in such a short period of time. They are all lying. Watch how, sooner or later, the real picture will be significantly different from the first account.

Does any of this really matter? Yes, because "two wrongs don't make a right", and if you act as the enemy does, you become just as bad. Which, given what we know thanks to Wikileaks, is the case with the U.S. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Belgian Buggery

The Catholic Church's sex abuse scandal won't go away; instead, it keeps growing every day.  Take the story out of Belgium, where a report has been issued that details what went on, including more than a dozen suicides linked to the abuse perpetrated by priests and  a cover up that continues to this day, when a Belgian bishop suggested that a complaint be withheld until 2011, when the bishop who covered up for the offending priest will retire.  With each passing day, it becomes more and more difficult to hold that this behavior was just the work of a few rogue priests.  There are just too many cases all around the world, for anyone to believe such a thing. This is clearly a major problem which the church tried to hide from the authorities and recklessly let it continue, without any regard for children elsewhere, by transferring priests.  There is no excuse for this unpardonable sin.
Read more

Hear, Hear!

Not that it means a whole lot, but, still, the gesture has some significance. After 33 years on the throne, the Dutch queen, at 76, will abdicate in favor of her son. Not subject to election by the vote of her people, she has done the right thing by resigning, so to speak, and letting her son carry on with the royal duties. At 86, and 60 years on the throne, Queen Elizabeth would do well to follow this example. Hanging on to the throne at her age and after so many years seems excessive and ungenerous. The same goes for King Juan Carlos, who has just turned 75, and has been on the throne for 37 years. His son will be 45 two days from now, so is already older than his father was when he became King. In Juan Carlos' case, he has, of late, given signs of poor judgment, that could very well be a result of his age. Queen Elizabeth and King Juan Carlos should follow Queen Beatrix 's example.
Read more

Chinese Capitalism

The fact that Asia now boasts of having the biggest number of millionaires in the world is a sign of the times. The predictions of a few years ago have come true: China is the world's next superpower, and the increasing wealth of its economic elite shows it. The sleeping dragon has awakened.
Read more