The American Contradiction

From 1776 onward, the U.S has boastfully proclaimed itself to be the beacon of democracy, freedom, liberty and human rights for the rest of the world. Much of that has been based on the right to vote and choose freely those who govern. Time and time again, the Americans have prompted other peoples to adopt democracy and the principle of "one man, one vote" as its cornerstone, condemning regimes that have no free elections.

Having said that, why is it that the U.S. is trying desperately to convince the Palestinians to not seek a vote in the United Nations on whether they should be recognized as a state with certain rights and prerogatives? If a voting democracy is the ideal political system for all people and all time, why not let the democratic process run its course, and respect its outcome, whatever it may be? If the rest of the international community wishes to support the Palestinians, they should be allowed to do so in a democratic and peaceful way. But, trying to prevent that the issue is voted on is contrary to the most basic of democratic principles and a glaring contradiction of the principles on which the American democracy is based. It is, in fact, a selective application of those principles, and shows that the U.S doesn't really believe in them and that all that preachy rhetoric is just propaganda. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Belgian Buggery

The Catholic Church's sex abuse scandal won't go away; instead, it keeps growing every day.  Take the story out of Belgium, where a report has been issued that details what went on, including more than a dozen suicides linked to the abuse perpetrated by priests and  a cover up that continues to this day, when a Belgian bishop suggested that a complaint be withheld until 2011, when the bishop who covered up for the offending priest will retire.  With each passing day, it becomes more and more difficult to hold that this behavior was just the work of a few rogue priests.  There are just too many cases all around the world, for anyone to believe such a thing. This is clearly a major problem which the church tried to hide from the authorities and recklessly let it continue, without any regard for children elsewhere, by transferring priests.  There is no excuse for this unpardonable sin.
Read more

Hear, Hear!

Not that it means a whole lot, but, still, the gesture has some significance. After 33 years on the throne, the Dutch queen, at 76, will abdicate in favor of her son. Not subject to election by the vote of her people, she has done the right thing by resigning, so to speak, and letting her son carry on with the royal duties. At 86, and 60 years on the throne, Queen Elizabeth would do well to follow this example. Hanging on to the throne at her age and after so many years seems excessive and ungenerous. The same goes for King Juan Carlos, who has just turned 75, and has been on the throne for 37 years. His son will be 45 two days from now, so is already older than his father was when he became King. In Juan Carlos' case, he has, of late, given signs of poor judgment, that could very well be a result of his age. Queen Elizabeth and King Juan Carlos should follow Queen Beatrix 's example.
Read more

Chinese Capitalism

The fact that Asia now boasts of having the biggest number of millionaires in the world is a sign of the times. The predictions of a few years ago have come true: China is the world's next superpower, and the increasing wealth of its economic elite shows it. The sleeping dragon has awakened.
Read more