Equity in Ecuador
Unless I'm missing something, Chevron's claim that plaintiffs' lawyers and the Ecuadorean judge that handed down a decision to grant $18 billion in damages for an oil spill did something wrong because the lawyers helped to draft the court's decision is frivolous. I don't know about Ecuador judicial procedure, but it's common practice for a judge to ask for a draft of a decision by the winning side. As long as the judge does not rubber-stamp it, that is to say, accept it without a careful review of the facts and the law, there is nothing objectionable about this way of helping a judge do his duty expeditiously.
So, I suppose that this is a tactic to smear reputations and have a higher court overturn the $18 billion verdict, which, I'm sure, is the real issue here.
So, I suppose that this is a tactic to smear reputations and have a higher court overturn the $18 billion verdict, which, I'm sure, is the real issue here.
Comments
Post a Comment