Scalia Stumbles Supremely

See, this is what happens when people, even intelligent people, are so intent on proving their point, that they make ridiculous mistakes. Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Antonin Scalia, a bright fellow by all accounts, is so set against Obama and his health program, that, in arguing against it, he committed the unforgivable sin of any lawyer, let alone judge: he referred to a non-existent legal provision. One of the first things they teach you at law school is to be sure of what the current law is on any given subject. This means that you have to check the text and make sure that it hasn't been modified in any way. Also, you have to check if there is any jurisprudence that may have altered it.

So, Justice Scalia, who thinks very highly of himself, I'm sure, has erred egregiously for all the world to see. He has shown that, in this issue, he has let his emotions, likes and dislikes get the best of him, making a very poor showing of his judicial temperament.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Belgian Buggery

The Catholic Church's sex abuse scandal won't go away; instead, it keeps growing every day.  Take the story out of Belgium, where a report has been issued that details what went on, including more than a dozen suicides linked to the abuse perpetrated by priests and  a cover up that continues to this day, when a Belgian bishop suggested that a complaint be withheld until 2011, when the bishop who covered up for the offending priest will retire.  With each passing day, it becomes more and more difficult to hold that this behavior was just the work of a few rogue priests.  There are just too many cases all around the world, for anyone to believe such a thing. This is clearly a major problem which the church tried to hide from the authorities and recklessly let it continue, without any regard for children elsewhere, by transferring priests.  There is no excuse for this unpardonable sin.
Read more

Hear, Hear!

Not that it means a whole lot, but, still, the gesture has some significance. After 33 years on the throne, the Dutch queen, at 76, will abdicate in favor of her son. Not subject to election by the vote of her people, she has done the right thing by resigning, so to speak, and letting her son carry on with the royal duties. At 86, and 60 years on the throne, Queen Elizabeth would do well to follow this example. Hanging on to the throne at her age and after so many years seems excessive and ungenerous. The same goes for King Juan Carlos, who has just turned 75, and has been on the throne for 37 years. His son will be 45 two days from now, so is already older than his father was when he became King. In Juan Carlos' case, he has, of late, given signs of poor judgment, that could very well be a result of his age. Queen Elizabeth and King Juan Carlos should follow Queen Beatrix 's example.
Read more

Chinese Capitalism

The fact that Asia now boasts of having the biggest number of millionaires in the world is a sign of the times. The predictions of a few years ago have come true: China is the world's next superpower, and the increasing wealth of its economic elite shows it. The sleeping dragon has awakened.
Read more